More Degree Opportunities for Singaporeans

Mr Lawrence Wong, Minister of State, Ministry of Defence and Ministry of Education, highlighted the key considerations for expanding university places in his speech at the UniSIM convocation ceremony on 6 Oct 2011. The following is an excerpt from his speech. What are your thoughts?

Excerpt from speech by Mr Lawrence Wong at the First Session of SIM University (UniSIM) Convocation Ceremony

… Going forward, the demand for university education in Singapore will continue to rise. Our economy is growing in scale and sophistication, and will need more highly-skilled manpower. Our business and employment landscape is also changing, brought about by globalisation and technology. This is the way the world is going, and Singapore is carried along with it. IT is automating simple and routine jobs, including white-collar ones. At the same time, rapidly developing countries like China, India and others in ASEAN are sending hundreds of millions of young and willing workers into the global labour market, holding down wages at the lower end. Even at the tertiary levels, these countries will produce more graduates than there are Singaporeans. So the premium is on educating Singaporeans well, with skills, knowledge and the ability to learn, re-learn and switch careers in tandem with changing economic and industry requirements.

This is why the Government places such a high priority on education. We are increasing our investments in the polytechnics and new ITE Colleges. We are also expanding the university sector to increase and provide more university intakes to meet the aspirations of Singaporeans and the manpower needs of the economy.

I am now chairing a Committee on University Education Pathways to study how we can help even more Singaporeans benefit from a university education. The Committee members and I are talking to many people and engaging a wide range of stakeholders—teachers, parents, students, employers. We are still at the early stages of consultation; we have just started but we can already see some consensus around several key principles to guide our way forward.

First, we want a robust university sector with high standards. Over the years, our universities, whether NUS, NTU, SMU or UniSIM, have worked hard to establish themselves as academic institutions of excellence. Our universities today command strong public confidence in their ability to offer an education that is high-quality and industry-relevant. It is important that we maintain these high standards of education and admissions, even as we expand the university sector to cater to a wider spectrum of students with different abilities and talents.

Second, we must ensure that all university students continue to get good jobs after they graduate. The distribution of skill-sets among these graduates should therefore be closely matched to the demands of our economy. At the same time, given the rapid pace of change and uncertainty, universities cannot confine themselves to teaching within strict disciplinary boundaries. They will need to take a more integrated approach to knowledge learning and problem-solving. They must also expose their students to real-world industry experiences, and help develop a broader range of skills like teamwork and people skills.

Third, we will keep university education affordable to Singaporeans. The Government is committed towards subsidising the major proportion of the cost of education in our publicly-funded universities. No deserving students who are admitted to our universities will be denied a place due to financial difficulties.

The expansion of the university sector will entail an increase in Government funding. We have to ensure that any increase in Government funding for the university sector is sustainable and represents good value for taxpayers’ money. In many other countries where there are constraints in government budgets, universities are increasingly diversifying their funding sources to fulfil their missions. Likewise in Singapore, as we grow our university sector, we have to look at the mix between public and private funding of the universities, and work out an optimal balance.

Fourth, we should encourage diversity and healthy competition in the expanded university sector. It is not realistic to expect all our universities to excel in teaching every discipline, or to be equally adept at research. Diversity will allow each university to develop niches of excellence based on its individual strengths and traditions. This will also meet the wider spectrum of educational needs and abilities of our larger student intake, and help every individual actualize his full potential.

With a more diverse university sector, we can also look forward to more healthy competition. We would like to see our universities spurring each other on towards new heights in teaching, carving out individual niches of excellence, and developing their own brand and value proposition to attract students. All this will contribute to a university sector in Singapore that is innovative, vibrant, and responsive to the needs of both the students and the economy.

Finally, we ought to see universities as part of a larger network of education institutions to equip Singaporeans for work and life. Not all good students will benefit from or want an academically-intensive learning environment. Some prefer more practice-based and hands-on training in our polytechnics. After the diploma, they can still consider the university option, or they can work first, and then get their degrees later, like what many of you have done. There are advantages to this. After working for some time, you gain a better sense of where your talents and passion really lie, and so you can pursue your degrees in fields that you have a real interest in and study with confidence and excel at what you do.

We must therefore develop a range of institutions with different areas of focus and programme offerings, in order to cater to these diverse education pathways. It will not be wise to have an education system that focuses only on the university track. Some countries have taken this approach by converting their polytechnics into universities. Where they do this, it is very easy to get a degree—in some countries, as high as 70% to 80% of the cohort are university graduates. But after graduation, they find that it is not so easy to find a job. As a result, youth (graduate) unemployment is a big problem. Several of these countries are now trying to rebuild their vocational training institutes to equip their young people with relevant skills. This is an important lesson for us—as we expand the university sector, we must understand that it is not just about university education but having a good range of educational institutions. We must continue to invest and maintain high standards in our polytechnics and ITE.

I have highlighted some broad principles which will help guide us in our work. Based on these principles, we will then consider in greater detail the different options for expanding the university sector. Should we set up a new university? Should we expand existing publicly-funded institutions? Should we leverage more on private institutions to increase university places for JC and polytechnic students? Should we focus more on adult learners and in-employment training, so that those who choose to work first can still access high-quality degrees later?

These are various options that we have to take into consideration and study what is the best approach to take. …

Read the full speech.